Ten years ago I completed the manuscript of Gender Trouble and sent it
to Routledge for publication. I did not know that the text would have
as wide an audience as it has had, nor did I know that it would consti
tute a provocative “intervention” in feminist theory or be cited as one
of the founding texts of queer theory.The life of the text has exceeded
my intentions, and that is surely in part the result of the changing con
text of its reception. As I wrote it, I understood myself to be in an
embattled and oppositional relation to certain forms of feminism, even
as I understood the text to be part of feminism itself. I was writing in
the tradition of immanent critique that seeks to provoke critical exam
ination of the basic vocabulary of the movement of thought to which it
belongs.There was and remains warrant for such a mode of criticism
and to distinguish between self-criticism that promises a more democ
ratic and inclusive life for the movement and criticism that seeks to
undermine it altogether. Of course, it is always possible to misread the
former as the latter, but I would hope that that will not be done in the
case of Gender Trouble.