US Policy Under Trump or Harris

The article discusses how the 2025 U.S. presidential election will shape U.S. foreign policy toward the Global South, highlighting key differences between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris’s approaches. Trump is anticipated to adopt a protectionist stance, emphasizing economic nationalism through tariffs that may disrupt trade with countries in Latin America, Africa, and Asia. His policies could pressure these regions to align with the U.S. in its rivalry with China, potentially unsettling economic and geopolitical stability. Conversely, Harris is expected to favor multilateralism and collaborative initiatives, such as the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework, which would enable Global South nations to maintain flexible trade relations while managing U.S.-China tensions without drastic realignments.

In terms of security and diplomatic influence, Trump’s transactional alliances could lead to reduced U.S. security commitments, particularly in Asia and the Middle East, pushing some nations to independently strengthen their defenses. Harris would likely continue Biden-era policies, emphasizing stable alliances and a consultative approach to security that fosters stability. Her administration might also support economic cooperation on climate change and digital infrastructure, appealing to Global South nations aiming for sustainable growth. Both candidates’ approaches will profoundly impact trade, security, and diplomatic dynamics across these regions, each presenting distinct challenges and opportunities.

OVERVIEW :

The article critically examines the starkly different foreign policy approaches that Donald Trump and Kamala Harris might bring if either claims the U.S. presidency in 2025, focusing on their possible effects on the Global South. With Trump, expect a bold return to protectionism—his economic nationalism could create waves across Latin American, African, and Asian markets, as countries brace for stricter U.S.-China trade policies. Trump’s approach is like a storm on the horizon, unpredictable and potentially disruptive, demanding Global South nations to carefully chart their own course amid rising tensions.

Harris, by contrast, is seen as an advocate of multilateralism, likely to support trade frameworks offering Global South nations more flexibility in managing U.S.-China relations. Her style leans towards cooperation rather than confrontation, building bridges where Trump may erect barriers.

In security and diplomacy, Trump’s “transactional” alliance model might reduce America’s defense commitments, especially in Asia and the Middle East, nudging regional players to invest more heavily in their own defenses. Meanwhile, Harris would probably build on Biden’s strategy, strengthening partnerships and promoting a stable global order. Her likely focus on climate action and digital infrastructure aligns closely with the development priorities of emerging economies. In essence, the next U.S. administration will not only shape America’s foreign policy but could cast a long shadow over the growth and stability of the Global South, setting the stage for either friction or cooperation across global trade, security, and diplomacy.

NOTES :

This article provides In-depth analysis into international relations, especially in the context of U.S. foreign policy’s influence on the Global South. Examining Trump’s protectionist policies and Harris’s multilateral approach could help aspirants understand the economic and geopolitical impact of great power politics on developing regions, relevant to subjects like International Relations, Current Affairs, and Pakistan Affairs.

CSS Syllabus Relevance:

– International Relations: Impact of U.S. foreign policy on trade, security, and alliances. 

– Current Affairs: U.S. influence on the Global South’s economic and security dynamics. 

– Pakistan Affairs: Analysis of global power shifts and their potential impact on Pakistan’s foreign policy.

Notes for Beginners with Examples:

– Protectionist Policy Example: A government raising tariffs on imported goods to boost local industries. 

– Transactional Alliance Example: A relationship where two countries support each other’s policies primarily for mutual benefit, such as military support in exchange for financial aid.

Facts and Figures:

– Trump’s previous administration imposed tariffs on $350 billion worth of Chinese goods. 

– Harris’s stance supports international frameworks like the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework, aimed at strengthening regional trade without aggressive tariff measures.

To sum up, This article sheds light on the contrasting impacts of Trump’s and Harris’s foreign policy directions on the Global South. While Trump’s potential policies could disrupt trade and security ties, Harris’s multilateral approach may encourage stability and balanced alliances, allowing Global South nations to navigate U.S.-China dynamics with more autonomy. The upcoming U.S. election is thus poised to influence both economic resilience and geopolitical strategies across these developing regions.

Difficult Words and Meanings: