Lessons for India, Israel and Pakistan  Author – Imtiaz Gul

India and Israel, in their recent regional misadventures, bit off more than they could chew, underestimating the deep-rooted national resolve of Iran and Pakistan. While India flexed its muscles by breaching the Indus Waters Treaty and launching missile strikes, it was met with both internal skepticism and external resistance. Israel too overplayed its hand in its attack on Iran, believing its technological dominance could overpower centuries-old resilience fused with ideological unity. The result? Both nations faced diplomatic cold shoulders. India’s posturing led to isolation at the SCO forum, while Iran openly appreciated Pakistan’s solidarity and ignored India’s silence, sending a loud and clear message about regional loyalties and diplomatic maturity.

○The article goes on to lay bare the strategic blunders of relying solely on military tech and arrogance while dismissing national spirit and alliances. The unraveling of an Israeli spy network further exposes the perils of modern warfare, which is no longer just about bombs and bullets but data and deception. In trying to play big, both India and Israel have drawn fresh fault lines, forcing realignments across South and West Asia. If anything, the saga reinforces one timeless lesson: military might may shake buildings, but it rarely crushes collective resolve or historic identity, especially when it’s anchored in faith, culture and global alliances.

Overview:

The article draws parallels between India’s and Israel’s recent actions that attempted to assert dominance through military means and political arrogance. It shows how both underestimated the strength of national unity in Iran and Pakistan, resulting in strategic and diplomatic setbacks. The piece highlights the shifting regional alliances and warns about future threats from espionage and cyberwarfare.

NOTES:

The article highlights the recent geopolitical tensions involving India, Israel, Pakistan and Iran. It also highlights how overreliance on military might and political arrogance can backfire in today’s interconnected world. It discusses how India’s aggressive move to suspend the Indus Waters Treaty and launch missile strikes into Pakistan not only drew international criticism but also failed to gain support from its own allies. Similarly Israel’s misjudged attack on Iran underestimated the Iranian nation’s collective resolve, deeply rooted in historical pride and religious unity. Both countries, despite their technological edge, stumbled on the diplomatic front, especially at the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit, where India faced backlash and isolation due to its posturing. Iran’s visible tilt toward Pakistan was demonstrated through public gratitude, while India’s refusal to sign off on statements that favored Iran further widened the diplomatic gap. The article also highlights India’s move to renegotiate the Ganga Waters Treaty with Bangladesh, raising concerns about its consistent use of regional dominance. In contrast, Pakistan emerged diplomatically poised and supported, backed by China and recognized by Iran. The piece concludes by warning of the dangers posed by espionage and cyber-infiltration, stressing the urgency for SCO members to enhance collective defense strategies.

Related CSS Subjects and Topics:

• International Relations: Regional conflicts, diplomacy, multilateral organizations, strategic alliances
• Pakistan Affairs: Indo-Pak relations, foreign policy challenges, strategic positioning
• Current Affairs: Recent geopolitical events, role of SCO, water disputes
• Political Science: Foreign policy behavior, national interest vs. global alignment

Notes for Beginners:

This article compares India and Israel’s aggressive actions with how Pakistan and Iran responded with unity and strength. India tried to act tough by attacking Pakistan and changing water agreements. But it backfired, and other countries didn’t support it. Iran also faced Israeli attacks but stayed strong and even got support from Pakistan. The message is simple: having advanced weapons is not enough if you don’t have strong national unity and good relations with neighbors.

Facts and Figures:

• India suspended the Indus Waters Treaty unilaterally in May 2025.
• Israel’s attack on Iran happened during the aftermath of the October 2023 Hamas-Israel conflict.
• The SCO Summit held in Qingdao, China, on June 26, 2025, showed regional disapproval of India’s stance.
• Iran publicly thanked Pakistan but made no mention of India, revealing diplomatic friction.

To put it simply, the unfolding scenarios reveal how overconfidence and isolationist strategies can backfire on regional powers. India and Israel’s miscalculations didn’t just fail militarily but also cost them diplomatic ground. In contrast Pakistan and Iran displayed composure, unity and resilience that shifts the regional chessboard in their favor. The lesson is unmistakable: power without prudence only deepens the chasm of conflict.

Difficult Words and Meaning:

• Fiasco – A complete failure, especially humiliating (Syn: disaster | Ant: success)
• Duplicitous – Deceitful or dishonest (Syn: deceptive | Ant: honest)
• Belligerence – Aggressive behavior or warlike conduct (Syn: hostility | Ant: diplomacy)
• Carte-blanche – Complete freedom to act (Syn: full authority | Ant: restriction)
• Realignment – Strategic reorganization or shift (Syn: repositioning | Ant: status quo)